<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>PolITiGenomics &#187; AGBT</title>
	<atom:link href="http://www.politigenomics.com/tag/agbt/feed" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://www.politigenomics.com</link>
	<description>Politics, Information Technology, and Genomics</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 21 Apr 2011 17:49:06 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.2.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>The Pac&#8217;s out of the bag</title>
		<link>http://www.politigenomics.com/2010/02/the-pacs-out-of-the-bag.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.politigenomics.com/2010/02/the-pacs-out-of-the-bag.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 24 Feb 2010 03:51:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[genomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PacBio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wustl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politigenomics.com/?p=2153</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Most of you have probably already seen this, but Pacific Biosciences announced the institutions that will be getting their first ten prototype instruments (Bio-IT World, GenomeWeb, MarketWatch). The Genome Center is among the institutions that will be getting one. It looks like PacBio will indeed be the first third generation sequencing company with instruments out [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Most of you have probably already seen this, but <a href="http://www.pacificbiosciences.com/">Pacific Biosciences</a> announced the <a href="http://blogs.forbes.com/sciencebiz/2010/02/speedy-prototype-gene-decoders-sold/?boxes=businesschannelsections">institutions that will be getting their first ten prototype instruments</a> (<a href="http://www.bio-itworld.com/2010/02/23/pacbio-customers.html">Bio-IT World</a>, <a href="http://www.genomeweb.com/sequencing/pacbio-names-first-10-customers-695000-single-molecule-sequencer-first-shipments">GenomeWeb</a>, <a href="http://www.marketwatch.com/story/pacific-biosciences-announces-early-access-customers-for-its-single-molecule-real-time-system-2010-02-23?reflink=MW_news_stmp">MarketWatch</a>). <a href="http://genome.wustl.edu/">The Genome Center</a> is among the institutions that will be getting one. It looks like PacBio will indeed be the first third generation sequencing company with instruments out in the wild. Don&#8217;t get too excited though, it&#8217;s probable that these third generation instruments will be a lot like the first batch of second generation instruments: it will take a while before they are ready for production sequencing, reliably producing good quality data. We&#8217;ll find out more from all the sequencing instrument companies in the coming days at <a href="http://www.agbt.org/">AGBT</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politigenomics.com/2010/02/the-pacs-out-of-the-bag.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Blogorama</title>
		<link>http://www.politigenomics.com/2009/03/blogorama.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.politigenomics.com/2009/03/blogorama.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 25 Mar 2009 16:40:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[genomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[blog]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wustl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politigenomics.com/?p=978</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[For you RSS readers that do not visit the site, I thought I would point out a few of the blogs I have recently added to the Blogroll list on the right-hand side of the page. First, there are the infamous AGBT genomics bloggers, Genetic Future&#8217;s Daniel MacArthur (the most prolific of the bunch), Mass [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For you RSS readers that do not visit the site, I thought I would point out a few of the blogs I have recently added to the Blogroll list on the right-hand side of the page. First, there are the infamous <a href="http://www.massgenomics.org/2009/02/genomics-bloggers-meet-at-agbt.html">AGBT genomics bloggers</a>, <a href="http://scienceblogs.com/geneticfuture/">Genetic Future&#8217;s Daniel MacArthur</a> (the most prolific of the bunch), <a href="http://www.massgenomics.org/">Mass Genomics&#8217; Dan Koboldt</a>, and <a href="http://www.fejes.ca/">Anthony Fejes</a>. Others blogging in the genomics field are the imitable <a href="http://cryptogenomicon.org/">Sean Eddy</a> and <a href="http://genome.fieldofscience.com/">Steven Salzberg</a>, who recently moved his blog to <a href="http://www.fieldofscience.com/">Field of Science</a>. Finally, there are several more bloggers at <a href="http://genome.wustl.edu/">The Genome Center</a>, <a href="http://indraniel.livejournal.com/">Indraniel Das</a> from our LIMS group and Gary Stiehr, who has blogs on <a href="http://hpcinfo.wordpress.com/">high-performance computing</a> and <a href="http://researchitblog.wordpress.com/">research IT.</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politigenomics.com/2009/03/blogorama.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>My talk at AGBT</title>
		<link>http://www.politigenomics.com/2009/02/my-talk-at-agbt.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.politigenomics.com/2009/02/my-talk-at-agbt.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Feb 2009 15:40:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[genomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[454]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Creative Commons]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illumina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wustl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politigenomics.com/?p=870</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Several people have asked me to post my slides from AGBT. Given the type of slides I prepare, I thought that might be less than useful, so I recorded my talk and posted it to blip.tv. The narrative is a bit rough because I did it in one take a few weeks after I gave [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Several people have asked me to post my slides from AGBT. Given the type of slides I prepare, I thought that might be less than useful, so I recorded my talk and posted it to <a href="http://blip.tv/file/1787219">blip.tv</a>. The narrative is a bit rough because I did it in one take a few weeks after I gave the talk, but all the basics are there (actually, it is a bit longer, 20 minutes, than the talk I gave at AGBT).</p>
<div class="widevideo"><embed src="http://blip.tv/play/Ae3Uf5SFQQ" type="application/x-shockwave-flash" width="510" height="404" allowscriptaccess="always" allowfullscreen="true"></embed></div>
<p>Here are the links that appear on the last slide.
<ul>
<li><a href="http://genome.wustl.edu/">The Genome Center</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.politigenomics.com/">PolITiGenomics (this) blog</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.biomedcentral.com/1471-2105/8/362">LIMS Paper</a></li>
<li><a href="http://www.media-landscape.com/yapc/2006-06-27.ScottSmith/">YAPC UR presentation</a></li>
</ul>
<h3>The Odyssey</h3>
<p>So you may be asking yourself, how did he generate a movie of his talk? Even if you are not asking yourself that, I am going to tell you so that if you need to do it (or if I need to do it again), you can avoid a lot of hassle. This was all done on a MacBook using a slide deck created in MS PowerPoint 2008. First I tested screen capture using <a href="http://www.videolan.org/vlc/">VLC</a>. It took a few tries with the video settings to make it not look terrible (use H.264 at 1024 kb/s bitrate, 25 or more fps, MPEG 4 encapsulation), but the audio capture did not work. To compensate for the lack of audio, I did audio capture using GarageBand (podcast project type) at the same time I did the video capture. I then loaded the audio and the video into iMovie HD, synchronized the audio to the video, clipped the beginning and the end, and exported. This resulted in a fair quality product. Being stupid, I thought I could do better. I next tested recording narration in MS PowerPoint, but there didn&#8217;t seem to be a good way to export both a video of the slides with the recorded timings and the audio into a single format (not to mention it stupidly saves the audio in seemingly uncompressed files without an extension, one file per slide). So I imported the slides into Keynote 08, cleaned up the messes created by the import, recorded the slide show, and exported to QuickTime at high quality. This looked and played great in QuickTime so I went to upload it to <a href="http://www.youtube.com/user/ddgenome">YouTube</a>. Sorry, YouTube has a ridiculous and arbitrary limit of 10 minutes for a video. Moving on to <a href="http://ddgenome.blip.tv/">blip.tv</a> (which, nicely, also supports <a href="http://creativecommons.org/">Creative Commons</a> licensing), I uploaded the video. After waiting for it to convert, I played it and noticed that although the audio was fine, the slides did not advance. Thinking something was wrong with the blip.tv Flash converter, I moved on to <a href="http://www.vimeo.com/user1315280/videos">Vimeo</a>. Slides didn&#8217;t advance there either. So next I checked the video by watching it using VLC and <a href=http://www.mplayerhq.hu/"">mplayer</a>. No slide advancement. Trying to fix it, I went into the custom video settings when exporting in KeyNote, trying all sorts of combinations to generate a video that played well in VLC. Using various settings, I was able to get the slides to advance for a while, but eventually they would stop. Audio was always fine. I tried upgrading to Mac OS X 10.5. Still no luck (although in 10.5, VLC can capture from the iSight camera, so maybe audio capture will work in VLC now). I then recalled that the MPEG-2 on Mac was a little quirky (QuickTime won&#8217;t played decoded Tivo Series 2 video without first converting them to MPEG-4 using <a href="http://ffmpeg.org/">ffmpeg</a>). As a last ditch effort, I imported the KeyNote exported movie into iMovie HD as an MPEG-4 project. I check to make sure iMovie HD played it correctly, then exported at full quality as an MPEG-4. This ballooned the size of the video from around 20 MB to over 110 MB, lessened the quality, and introduced a strange pulsing phenomena in the slides (probably due to compression degradation being corrected by key frames every second or so), but it seemed to play correctly in VLC and was higher quality than the VLC capture video. This video, uploaded to blip.tv, is what you see above.</p>
<p><strong>Update:</strong> Here is how <a href="http://www.lessig.org/blog/2008/07/one_step_until_brilliant_scree.html">Lawrence Lessig screencasts</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politigenomics.com/2009/02/my-talk-at-agbt.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>SRA at AGBT</title>
		<link>http://www.politigenomics.com/2009/01/sra-at-agbt.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.politigenomics.com/2009/01/sra-at-agbt.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Jan 2009 19:59:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[genomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[informatics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wustl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politigenomics.com/?p=828</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I forgot to mention in my previous post about AGBT 2009 that Niel Das from our LIMS group will be presenting a poster about our NCBI SRA data submission pipeline and infrastructure. For all you struggling with that impenetrable XML specification, here&#8217;s your chance to ask an expert.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I forgot to mention in my <a href="http://www.politigenomics.com/2009/01/next-generation-informatics-at-agbt.html">previous post about AGBT 2009</a> that Niel Das from our <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Laboratory_Information_Management_System">LIMS</a> group will be presenting a poster about our <a href="http://www.politigenomics.com/2008/05/short-read-archive.html">NCBI SRA</a> data submission pipeline and infrastructure. For all you struggling with that impenetrable XML specification, here&#8217;s your chance to ask an expert.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politigenomics.com/2009/01/sra-at-agbt.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>4</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Next-Generation Informatics at AGBT</title>
		<link>http://www.politigenomics.com/2009/01/next-generation-informatics-at-agbt.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.politigenomics.com/2009/01/next-generation-informatics-at-agbt.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Jan 2009 18:23:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[genomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[IT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[informatics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wustl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.politigenomics.com/?p=797</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[AGBT 2009 will be starting in about two weeks in Marco Island, FL. The 10th annual AGBT meeting looks like it is going to be very impressive. With all of the advances in sequencing and genomics over the last year and the announcement of future platform updates, there should be a lot to take in. [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.agbt.org/"><img class="alignright" alt="AGBT logo" src="http://www.agbt.org/images/logo.jpg" title="AGBT" width="240" height="85" /></a> <a href="http://www.agbt.org/">AGBT</a> 2009 will be starting in about two weeks in Marco Island, FL. The 10th annual AGBT meeting <a href="http://www.agbt.org/agenda.html">looks like it is going to be very impressive</a>. With all of the advances in sequencing and genomics over the last year and the announcement of future platform updates, there should be a lot to take in. I will be speaking at this years meeting so, if you are attending, please consider coming to give a listen. My talk will be Thursday evening, 5 Feb 2009, in the Bioinformatics session chaired by Deanna Church. Here is the abstract of my talk.</p>
<blockquote><p>Massively parallel sequencing platforms are generating sequence data at a rate that is rapidly overwhelming the informatics community’s analysis throughput.  From large projects like 1000 Genomes to individual investigator labs with a single next-generation sequencing instrument, bioinformaticians are being bombarded with unprecedented amounts of data.  To begin to address this issue, much recent bioinformatics research has focused on developing faster algorithms for alignment, assembly, annotation, etc., resulting in a proliferation of analysis tools.  However, faster algorithms for traditional analyses are only one aspect of the recent bioinformatics explosion.  The richness of data now available to bioinformaticians allows investigators to ask new types of questions requiring new algorithms and new approaches, e.g., in the fields of medical and population genomics.  The data and tools explosion has created a dichotomy for the bioinformatician: perform high-throughput analysis on large volumes of samples while evaluating many different tools and analysis workflows.  High-throughput pipelines are linear and static and require detailed tracking.  Evaluating tools and comparing results from different workflows are non-linear and ever-changing (especially in the current environment of rapidly evolving sequencing technologies and analysis tools) and typically involve many false starts that are not tracked.  To reconcile these contrasting requirements, we have developed a software framework for genome analysis that combines ease-of-use, detailed tracking and reporting, flexible chaining of tools to define workflows, results comparison, and scalability.  The design of this framework heavily leverages the lessons we have learned in developing a laboratory information management system for high-throughput genome sequencing in an environment implementing continual process improvements.  The result is a next-generation informatics framework that will allow bioinformatics tools and workflows to be part of the experimental design of sequencing projects.</p></blockquote>
<p> Sounds exciting, eh? Looking at the other talks in the session, it seems I should not delve too much into the coding details and focus more on the motivation and high-level concepts used in our system.</p>
<p>Several other people from <a href="http://genome.wustl.edu/">The Genome Center</a> will also be attending and presenting. Our Director, <a href="http://genome.wustl.edu/Bio/WilsonBIO.cgi">Rick Wilson</a>, will be giving a keynote address on Saturday. Co-Director <a href="http://genome.wustl.edu/Bio/MardisBIO.cgi">Elaine Mardis</a> will chair the always interesting New Genomic Frontiers plenary session (don&#8217;t make the mistake of booking that early flight, you&#8217;ll miss the best stuff). Todd Wylie and Jon Armstrong from our Technology Development group will be giving talks on miRNA characterization and capture techniques, respectively. Also, be sure to check out Dan Koboldt&#8217;s blog post giving a sneak preview of the <a href="http://www.massgenomics.org/2009/01/short-read-aligners-update-at-agbt.html">poster he will be presenting about the performance of various short-read aligners</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politigenomics.com/2009/01/next-generation-informatics-at-agbt.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Hyperkaster</title>
		<link>http://www.politigenomics.com/2008/04/hyperkaster.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.politigenomics.com/2008/04/hyperkaster.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 03 Apr 2008 16:35:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>dd</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[genomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Illumina]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[informatics]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/?p=53</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[No, this post is not about the latest Fender guitar. It is about the Illumina Genome Analyzer II (or GA2), formerly known as the Hyperkaster. This latest rev of the Solexa instrument boasts an almost entirely new optics system, wider flow cell lanes, faster run times, longer reads, and about twice as much data per [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://www.fender.com/products/prod_images/guitars/0100202850_md.png" onblur="try {parent.deselectBloggerImageGracefully();} catch(e) {}"><img style="float:right; margin:0 0 10px 10px;cursor:pointer; cursor:hand;width: 200px;" src="http://www.fender.com/products/prod_images/guitars/0100202850_md.png" border="0" alt="" /></a> No, this post is not about the latest <a href="http://www.fender.com/">Fender guitar</a>.  It is about the Illumina Genome Analyzer II (or GA2), formerly known as the Hyperkaster.  This latest rev of the Solexa instrument boasts an almost entirely new optics system, wider flow cell lanes, faster run times, longer reads, and about twice as much data per run.  The camera has been upgraded from a 1 megapixel <a href="Chttp://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Charge-coupled_device">CCD</a> to a 4 megapixel CCD, thus each picture (or tile in Solexa-speak) captures four times the area the old system did.  This means that even with the 40% wider flow cell lanes, you have to take fewer images to cover the flow cell.  If you are familiar with the current instrument, that means instead of taking 3×110 images per lane per color, you take 2×50 images.  Fewer images means faster imaging, which leads to shorter run times.  For a 50 cycle fragment run, the run time should be about 2.3 days; down from 3.2 days (multiple by two to get your paired-end run times).  One problem with the larger image area is ensuring even illumination across the image (since the laser used to excite the fluorescing molecules is much smaller than the area of the image).  To address this, the system now uses a square beam shaper.  The new beam shaper coupled with the improved mode scrambler lead to more even illumination on the larger images as compared to the old optical system with the smaller images.  Nonetheless, there are still edge effects from the imaging.  However, larger images, fewer images, and more even illumination means the edge effects affect a much smaller proportion of the clusters in the flow cell.</p>
<p>Another major change in the GA2 is the addition of the <a href="http://www.solexa.com/pages.ilmn?ID=270">IPAR computer</a>.  This system allows the analysis of images to obtain intensities during the chemistry portion of the instrument cycle.  This means that it is possible to no longer have to transfer the 1.8 TB of raw images that the instrument generates during a paired-end run.  Unfortunately, the IPAR runs on Microsoft Windows, breaking with the <a href="http://www.politigenomics.com/2008/01/platform-independent.html">run-anywhere philosophy</a> of previous versions of Solexa&#8217;s image analysis pipeline.</p>
<p>Here are some raw specs for a paired-end run on a GA2.</p>
<ul>
<li>4 gigabases (Gb) of sequence</li>
<li>5 days</li>
<li>1800 GB of images</li>
<li>300+ GB for image analysis (Firecrest)</li>
<li>60+ GB for base calling (Bustard)</li>
<li>10-30 GB for sequence analysis and alignment (GERALD)</li>
</ul>
<p>As you can see, this system approaches nearly 1 Gb of sequence per day.  Unfortunately, with the name changed to GA2, we will probably not receive a free guitar with each instrument purchase.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politigenomics.com/2008/04/hyperkaster.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>2</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AGBT 2008, part 2</title>
		<link>http://www.politigenomics.com/2008/02/agbt-2008-part-2.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.politigenomics.com/2008/02/agbt-2008-part-2.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 29 Feb 2008 21:29:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[genomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[informatics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[software]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/?p=33</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, here is another quick hit from AGBT 2008. This year there were over 550 attendees and they still had to turn away over 200 people. No doubt all the interest is due to the next-generation sequencing technologies, giving labs and companies all over the world the ability to sequence DNA. Of course, just being [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, here is another <a href="http://www.politigenomics.com/2008/02/agbt-2008-part-1.html">quick hit</a> from <a href="http://www.agbt.org/flash/about.html">AGBT 2008</a>.  This year there were over 550 attendees and they still had to turn away over 200 people.  No doubt all the interest is due to the next-generation sequencing technologies, giving labs and companies all over the world the ability to sequence DNA.  Of course, just being able to generate the data does not mean you know how to deal with them.  To that end, in this entry I will talk about some of the software that was mentioned at AGBT.</p>
<ul>
<li><a href="http://www.sanger.ac.uk/Software/analysis/SSAHA2/">ssaha_pileup</a> &#8211; ssaha_pileup is part of the SSAHA2 (Sequence Search and Alignment by Hashing Algorithm) package.  It uses the SSAHA engine for alignments and then uses ssaha_pileup to call the consensus base at each position, thereby detecting <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Single_nucleotide_polymorphism">SNP</a>&#8216;s.  You can find the <a href="ftp://ftp.sanger.ac.uk/pub/zn1/ssaha_pileup/">source code</a> and <a href="ftp://ftp.sanger.ac.uk/pub/zn1/ssaha_pileup/ssaha_pileup-readme">documentation</a> on their FTP site.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.wikilims.com/">WikiLIMS</a> &#8211; WikiLIMS is a laboratory information management system based on the popular <a href="http://www.mediawiki.org/">MediaWiki</a> engine.  Basically the folks at <a href="http://blog.bioteam.net/tag/wikilims/">BioTeam</a> have created a few templates for MediaWiki allowing people to enter standard information about each sequencing, e.g., sample(s) information, cycles, instrument, and technician.  Once those fields are populated, the user can the use then resulting page as an electronic lab notebook for the experiment.  Clearly, they are targeting small labs with a couple or fewer instruments.  <a href="http://www.cshl.edu/public/SCIENCE/mccombie.html">Dick McCombie</a> at <a href="http://www.cshl.edu/">Cold Spring Harbor Laboratory</a> mentioned in his talk that their sequencing group uses it.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.annoj.org/">Anno-J</a> &#8211; Anno-J is very cool, Web 2.0 based software for annotating genomes.  The author says it is not quite ready for release, but he is planning on releasing it as free/open source software.  He hopes that will encourage others to design their own tracks and plugins.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.cbcb.umd.edu/software/glimmer/">Glimmer</a> &#8211; Glimmer is a system for finding genes in microbial DNA.  It is not new, but it was mentioned at the conference so I thought I would include it.</li>
<li><a href="http://www.pnas.org/cgi/content/full/104/50/20007">GISTIC</a> &#8211; Genomic Identification of Significant Targets in Cancer (GISTIC) is a program that takes as input a variety of whole genome array data from cancer samples and identifies regions which are statistically likely to play a role in cancer.</li>
<li><a href="http://sourceforge.net/projects/vcake">VCAKE</a> &#8211; VCAKE is a short-read <span style="font-style:italic;">de novo</span> assembler.  We have found that VCAKE performs quite well when you are able to provide it with a sequence to nucleate <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Contig">contigs</a> around.  The authors are working on a color-space version for AB SOLiD data.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politigenomics.com/2008/02/agbt-2008-part-2.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Pacific Biosciences</title>
		<link>http://www.politigenomics.com/2008/02/pacific-biosciences.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.politigenomics.com/2008/02/pacific-biosciences.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Feb 2008 15:45:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[genomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PacBio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/?p=28</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I mentioned Pacific Biosciences in my first post about AGBT 2008. A faithful reader pointed me to this article in the New York Times entitled The Race to Read Genomes on a Shoestring, Relatively Speaking. It discusses PacBio and has a quote from Elaine Mardis.]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I mentioned <a href="http://www.pacificbiosciences.com/">Pacific Biosciences</a> in my first post about <a href="http://www.politigenomics.com/2008/02/agbt-2008-part-1.html">AGBT 2008</a>.  A faithful reader pointed me to this article in the New York Times entitled <a href="http://www.nytimes.com/2008/02/09/business/09genome.html?_r=2&amp;ref=business&amp;oref=slogin&amp;oref=slogin">The Race to Read Genomes on a Shoestring, Relatively Speaking</a>.  It discusses PacBio and has a quote from <a href="http://genome.wustl.edu/Bio/MardisBIO.cgi">Elaine Mardis</a>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politigenomics.com/2008/02/pacific-biosciences.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>AGBT 2008, part 1</title>
		<link>http://www.politigenomics.com/2008/02/agbt-2008-part-1.html</link>
		<comments>http://www.politigenomics.com/2008/02/agbt-2008-part-1.html#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 Feb 2008 22:47:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>admin</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[genomics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[AGBT]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[informatics]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[PacBio]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[Raindance]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[science]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[wustl]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://localhost/wordpress/?p=26</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I have been meaning to write about what I saw at the Advances in Genome Biology and Technology (AGBT) meeting a couple weeks ago, but have not had time to sit and generate a long post. So I will try to post several shorter entries as I get time. The best session at AGBT was [...]]]></description>
			<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I have been meaning to write about what I saw at the <a href="http://www.agbt.org/flash/about.html">Advances in Genome Biology and Technology (AGBT)</a> meeting a couple weeks ago, but have not had time to sit and generate a long post.  So I will try to post several shorter entries as I get time.</p>
<p>The best session at AGBT was on Saturday afternoon, Future Horizons in Genome Exploration (chaired by my boss <a href="http://genome.wustl.edu/Bio/MardisBIO.cgi">Elaine Mardis</a>).  It started with an entertaining talk by Stephan Schuster about the mammoth genome.  Mammoths are about as close to modern-day elephants as humans are to chimps.  John Leamon from <a href="http://www.raindancetechnologies.com/">RainDance Technologies</a> gave a talk on their very cool microfluidics platform, complete with cool <a href="http://www.raindancetechnologies.com/formulate.html">movies</a> (yes, movies not animations).  The session ended with a presentation by <a href="http://www.pacificbiosciences.com/">Pacific Biosciences</a> Founder and CTO Stephen Turner about their single molecule, real time sequencing platform.  Think about sequencing an entire human genome to tenfold redundancy in a matter of hours.  That&#8217;s a lot of data to analyze and store.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://www.politigenomics.com/2008/02/agbt-2008-part-1.html/feed</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>0</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>

